"SHE was widely supported and praised..." ???!!! I don't think so. We did not support or praise her attack on a pro-life person. Who supports such an attack, let alone praises it? The writer of this article is trying to subtly influence people against pro-lifers, those who defend babies from being killed in the womb. Go figure.
"...
It tells the story of a University
of California professor who
physically attacked an anti-
abortion demonstrator who had
the nerve to enter a "free-
speech zone" created for
discussion of the issue.
The professor ripped away her
protest sign, committing
assault and robbery, then later
told police the protest sign was
a "trigger" that provoked her
into defending her "personal
right to go to work and not be
in harm."
She was widely supported and
praised. And basically, the
article asks: Have we returned
to 1991, the year the PC wave
first peaked...." by Neil McDonald
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/world/story/1.2999060
It tells the story of a University
of California professor who
physically attacked an anti-
abortion demonstrator who had
the nerve to enter a "free-
speech zone" created for
discussion of the issue.
The professor ripped away her
protest sign, committing
assault and robbery, then later
told police the protest sign was
a "trigger" that provoked her
into defending her "personal
right to go to work and not be
in harm."
She was widely supported and
praised. And basically, the
article asks: Have we returned
to 1991, the year the PC wave
first peaked...." by Neil McDonald
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/world/story/1.2999060
--
"And we know that in all things God works
for the good of those who love him,..."
Romans 8.28
for the good of those who love him,..."
Romans 8.28
