"...." that "does not save a single human life."
PBA Ruling Excerpts : From the official online text,
at supremecourt.gov, of their Gonzales v.
Carhart opinion , Justices Anthony Kennedy, John Roberts,
Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito agree,
as:
- on pages 21-22, regarding a living child that, " the
removal of a small portion ['say, an arm or leg,'] of
the fetus is not prohibited ."
- on page 17, that to actually violate this regulation,
"requires the fetus to be delivered 'until… any part of the
fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the
mother.'"
- however, on page 18, " If a living fetus is delivered
past the critical point [the bellybutton] by accident or
inadvertence [and then killed by the abortionist
performing a textbook partial-birth abortion, then] no
crime has occurred ,"
- and on page 24 (regarding a situation in which the
abortionist had prepared the mother with laminaria to
open the cervix), there would be no violation
for performing an actual partial-birth abortion, as the
justices suggest, if the mother happened to be over
"dilate[d] ."
- on page 30, the justices hope that abortionists, "may
find different and less shocking methods to abort
[kill] the fetus ..."
- while on page 33, speaking of killing "late-term"
children, these justices say that abortionists should use
" reasonable alternative procedures"
- such as, on pages 4-6, by their own descriptions of
methods to kill the baby, that are still "legal" , include
" ripping it apart," " dismemberment ," " a leg might be
ripped off the fetus ," " friction causes the fetus to
tear apart ," "10 to 15 passes with the forceps,"
"evacuating the fetus piece by piece."
- on page 34, the Justices actually suggest other ways for
an abortionist to kill the same, late-term fully-intact
child, such as " an injection that kills the fetus is an
alternative..."
- and on page 36, this Republican majority says that the
authority for this " regulation," comes from " the
Commerce Clause ," as though children were inventory
or a crop to be harvested.
Thus pro-life leaders who initially praised this opinion
later condemned it as immoral (see below) for it is
a virtual late-term abortion manual , making the Gonzales
v. Carhart PBA ruling more brutally wicked than Roe v.
Wade itself.
PBA Ruling Analysis: Read C...."
updated PROTECT UNBORN LIFE ! Thanks for viewing and hopefully you are also FIGHTING for KINDNESS and the protection of unborn, or "pre-born" life ! ALSO SEE MY KINDNESS ACTIONS YouTube CHANNEL at http://www.youtube.com/kindnessactions
baby1
abe
My Blog List
Wednesday, March 2, 2016
EVERY DAY I BECOME MORE AWARE: "Partial-birth Abortion Ban Fiasco "| American Right To Life
The PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION (PBA) BAN SOUNDS GOOD & NICE & allowed some "pro-life" groups to raise TONS of money (including a michigan group),but as I have just discovered,the numerous exceptions make it almost meaningless,or even as they say actually a 'late term abortion manual" as you can see below. Its trickery to name it PBA. Shameful:
