Twitter Search / LifeNewsHQ

baby1

baby1

Support After Abortion

Live Action News

tiers replace 3

IMPORTANT DISTINCTIONS WE SHOULD ALL KNOW IF WE ARE PRO-LIFE OR CONSIDERING BECOMING ONE OF US. DID U KNOW THERE ARE DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF PRO-LIFERS WHICH I RECENTLY BECAME AWARE can be effectively distinguished by the labels “TIER 1 thru TIER 4”

, click on the links below to learn more:

WHO ARE TIER 1 PRO-LIFERS?

WHO ARE TIER 2 PRO-LIFERS?

WHO ARE TIER 3 PRO-LIFERS?

WHO ARE TIER 4 PRO-LIFERS?

state3 replace

PERSONAL POSITION

STATEMENT of VK: I

myself have evolved

into a TIER 1 PRO-

LIFER. I believe we

should RESPECT &

PROTECT LIFE at every

stage beginning at

conception and

regardless of the

circumstances. I have

compassion & empathy

for women who have

been raped but

do not believe the baby

should be killed for the

crime of the “father”

(ie the criminal rapist).

I also believe that

“special” babies (ie

mentally retarded, and

all categories of such,

et al ) are truly special

and even if not

“perfect” according to

society standards are

STILL made in the

image of God (imago

Deo) and also deserve

respect and protection.

–vk-

Latest Headlines from the Priests for Life Website

knee

TAKE A KNEE FOR UNBORN BABIES !!

civ war rplc2

WHEN DO WE DECLARE CIVIL WAR?! LIKE the SLAVERY DAYS,WE NEED TO SPLIT INTO “LIFE STATES” versus “ABORTIONSTATES” , and ALLOW THE ABORTION STATES TO KILLTHEMSELVES & THEIR HEIRS INTO OBLIVION, while the LIFESTATES LIVE HAPPILY EVER AFTER IN PROSPERITY, TRULY “UNDER GOD.” WHY THIS CAN’T HAPPEN (without a fight?) ? BECAUSE non-CHRISTIANS LIVE PARASITICALLY OFF of the TRUE CHRISTIANS. THEY DEFINE THEMSELVES IN CONTRAST TO US. WITHOUT CHRISTIANS, THEY CANNOT DEFINETHEMSELVES. THEY LACK SUBSTANCE. Click here to read more

Pro-Life Action League

ultimate commttment

There were those who called themselves anti-Slavery in the north during Civil War Days but were unwilling to make the ultimate commitment to set slaves free. There are those who call themselves prolife anti-Abortion today, but how many are willing to make the ultimate commitment to save the unborn in an organized effort similar to how Abraham Lincoln set slaves free ? Walk & talk without the ultimate commitment at a certain point becomes cowardice. I encourage ALL of you pro-Lifers to make the ultimate commitment to defend the unborn & infants ! click here to read more & begin the “percolation” towards enactment of the ultimate commitment . And we need an Abraham Lincoln to lead us !

abe

abe

LifeNews.com

Wednesday, September 16, 2026

πŸ‘ "British MPs Vote AGAINST Assisted Suicide Bill in Victory for Life "

https://www.google.com/search?q=British+MPs+Vote+AGAINST+Assisted+Suicide+Bill+in+Victory+for+Life+%28VIDEOS%29&client=ms-opera-mini-android&channel=new 

"
British MPs Vote AGAINST Assisted Suicide Bill in Victory for Life (VIDEOS) British Members of Parliament (MPs) voted 286 to 270 against the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on September 11, 2026, defeating the proposed assisted dying legislation for England and Wales.Vote Details and OutcomeThe Final Tally: 270 MPs voted in favor of the bill, while 286 voted against it, resulting in a narrow majority of 16 against.The Legislation: Introduced to the House of Commons, the bill would have allowed mentally competent, terminally ill adults with an estimated six months or less to live to request medical assistance to end their lives, subject to medical approvals and safeguards.The Result: Because it was defeated at second reading, the bill has fallen and cannot progress further during this parliamentary session.Reactions to the VoteOpponents and Life Advocates: Disability groups, campaigners, and critics who argued the bill lacked sufficient safeguards for vulnerable individuals celebrated the outcome as a significant and emotional victory.Supporters: Proponents of the legislation expressed devastation and shock, maintaining that the law denies terminally ill individuals a dignified choice and autonomy at the end of life. Observers note that while the issue is settled for the immediate future, it is likely to resurface in subsequent parliamentary terms.Watch the moment MPs voted against the assisted dying bill in the House of Commons